Yes and No
During Antigone and Creon's discussion, the concept of yes and no are brought up several times. Antigone repeatedly says no to Creon's pleas to just go back to her room. She blames him for saying yes to the duty of becoming King. According to Creon though, saying no is the easy route. "To say yes, you have to sweat and roll up your sleeves and plunge both hands into life up to the elbows" (37). What he means it that 'yes' involves responsibility and action, while 'no' is denying the path of nature. "Can you imagine a world in which trees say no to the sap?" (37) Animals are simple and are motivated by survival instincts: yes I am hungry, yes I am tired, yes I am thirty, yes I need to reproduce. On the other hand, humans are complicated because they have emotions. If Antigone was an animal, she would say yes to Creon because it would deter away from death, a survival instinct. That is Creon's argument. Antigone accuses Creon of taking a job he does not want. "I don't have to listen to you if I don't want to. You've said your yes" (35). Creon gave up life for a duty. Antigone is giving up her life for moral righteousness. One could argue for either character because a tragedy shows the inevitable deaths. It is destiny not evil or good that the two disagree.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Journal #11 Antigone
The chorus' tone has changed from casually retelling events to an emotional explanation. This change it due to the turn of events in the play. In the beginning, everyone seems fine so the chorus need not hype up the audience. Now, the audience is getting more engaged so the chorus uses this moment to explain to them, what makes a tragedy. It is kind of like another definition or essay on what a tragedy is. The chorus states that "In a tragedy, nothing is in doubt and everyone's destiny is known. That makes for tranquility [...] You're trapped. The whole sky has fallen on you" (24). In a couple paragraphs, the chorus' tone has changed once again to a more laid back voice. He understands the excitement in the audience and mimics it, but than draws them to the realization that there is no real suspense because there is no doubt or mystery about everyone's destiny. The chorus is also getting more personal with the audience by using 'you' and 'I'. This is Anouilh's way of forcing the audience to reflect the play on their own life.
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Journal #10 Antigone
List of Events
-Polynices and Eteocles have killed each other in battle.
-Creon declares Polynices shan't be buried and anyone that does so much to grieve him will be put the death
-At a ball, Haemon asks Antigone to marry him and she agrees
-Antigone knows she will die and thinks intensely
-She sneaks out to talk to Haemon
-They quarrel
-Nurse catches her
Reflection
Anouilh begins the play with the chorus who narrates the preceding and succeeding events. The tone is very casual even when talking about the deaths to come. She does this in order to give the audience the whole picture of the plot. A tragedy always ends in death so it does not matter that the ending is revealed, rather, the explanation prepares the audience for the cathartic reactions to the performance.
Antigone's motivation is to go against King Creon which is punishable by death. That is why her actions are kept secretive and she secludes herself. When the nurse catches her she purposely talks strangely and repeats things over and over as if mocking the Nurse. She uses many words to describe the beauty and wonderfulness of the night. "The garden was lovely. It was still asleep. Have you ever thought how lovely a garden is when it is not yet thinking of men?" (6). Her tone becomes precise as she tells the truth. "Antigone [soberly]. No. Not wicked" (7). It is soon revealed, that Antigone is afraid. After the argument with Isemene she begs Nurse to give her strength. With that strength she goes to tell Haemon that she cannot marry him. Antigone's actions are very well thought out, although she shows mild fear, she is determined to follow her plans. Anouilh shows what Antigone did during the night through Antigone's conversation with Haemon to better understand her feeling and motivation. Instead of showing the scene played out, the audience sees it through Antigone's view. This causes the audience to relate with Antigone more.
-Polynices and Eteocles have killed each other in battle.
-Creon declares Polynices shan't be buried and anyone that does so much to grieve him will be put the death
-At a ball, Haemon asks Antigone to marry him and she agrees
-Antigone knows she will die and thinks intensely
-She sneaks out to talk to Haemon
-They quarrel
-Nurse catches her
Reflection
Anouilh begins the play with the chorus who narrates the preceding and succeeding events. The tone is very casual even when talking about the deaths to come. She does this in order to give the audience the whole picture of the plot. A tragedy always ends in death so it does not matter that the ending is revealed, rather, the explanation prepares the audience for the cathartic reactions to the performance.
Antigone's motivation is to go against King Creon which is punishable by death. That is why her actions are kept secretive and she secludes herself. When the nurse catches her she purposely talks strangely and repeats things over and over as if mocking the Nurse. She uses many words to describe the beauty and wonderfulness of the night. "The garden was lovely. It was still asleep. Have you ever thought how lovely a garden is when it is not yet thinking of men?" (6). Her tone becomes precise as she tells the truth. "Antigone [soberly]. No. Not wicked" (7). It is soon revealed, that Antigone is afraid. After the argument with Isemene she begs Nurse to give her strength. With that strength she goes to tell Haemon that she cannot marry him. Antigone's actions are very well thought out, although she shows mild fear, she is determined to follow her plans. Anouilh shows what Antigone did during the night through Antigone's conversation with Haemon to better understand her feeling and motivation. Instead of showing the scene played out, the audience sees it through Antigone's view. This causes the audience to relate with Antigone more.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Topic Sentence
In Blood Wedding, by Fredrico Garcia Lorca, Father's optimistic attitude leads him to overlook inevitable truths.
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Journal #9 Blood Wedding
Journal #9: Create a list of themes that Lorca creates in the play.
1. Choosing between family obligations, traditions versus personal passion
The Bride is expected by her father and the community to get married to the Groom. This leads her to lie about her true feelings for Leonardo. She is pressured to follow the social norms, and attempts to, but in the end follows her passion.
2. The Bride's decision to let both the men she love kill each other, instead of choosing one-fate
Fate moves the Blood Wedding. It could be said that another Felix coming to kill the Groom was predetermined. This could be why the Mother fretted so much because she feared that this was inevitable. The Bride also leads the men to kill each other, although this is something she did not want herself. The Bride is guilty at the end she describes her motivation as "a woman consumed by fire". This was something that affected her emotionally and physically burning at her soul that she had to leave the Groom.
3. Living in an unhappy situation drives a person to seek control
The mother's character is very controlling of her son, the Groom. She is afraid of him marrying a bad girl. She is unhappy because she cannot forgive nor forget the death of her other son and husband. Thus she needs to control her son in hopes of keeping him from being killed as well.
The Bride is limited by traditional obligations to marry, especially after she gave the Groom her promise. This makes her very unhappy. She takes it out on the maid by being rude and bossy.
Both of these characters have no easy escape for their situation and this makes them very mad/unhappy. The loss of control is the main cause of depression. To cope, the mother and bride seek controlling another aspect of their life. In both cases, they control another character.
1. Choosing between family obligations, traditions versus personal passion
The Bride is expected by her father and the community to get married to the Groom. This leads her to lie about her true feelings for Leonardo. She is pressured to follow the social norms, and attempts to, but in the end follows her passion.
2. The Bride's decision to let both the men she love kill each other, instead of choosing one-fate
Fate moves the Blood Wedding. It could be said that another Felix coming to kill the Groom was predetermined. This could be why the Mother fretted so much because she feared that this was inevitable. The Bride also leads the men to kill each other, although this is something she did not want herself. The Bride is guilty at the end she describes her motivation as "a woman consumed by fire". This was something that affected her emotionally and physically burning at her soul that she had to leave the Groom.
3. Living in an unhappy situation drives a person to seek control
The mother's character is very controlling of her son, the Groom. She is afraid of him marrying a bad girl. She is unhappy because she cannot forgive nor forget the death of her other son and husband. Thus she needs to control her son in hopes of keeping him from being killed as well.
The Bride is limited by traditional obligations to marry, especially after she gave the Groom her promise. This makes her very unhappy. She takes it out on the maid by being rude and bossy.
Both of these characters have no easy escape for their situation and this makes them very mad/unhappy. The loss of control is the main cause of depression. To cope, the mother and bride seek controlling another aspect of their life. In both cases, they control another character.
Monday, May 7, 2012
Journal #8 Blood Wedding
Journal #8: How does the set change between acts and what effect does the set have on the atmosphere?
Act I had simpler scenes that took place in the homes of the mother, Leonardo, and the Bride. In Act II, there is a larger contrast from Act I. Act II, Scene I, starts off at the wedding party. Everyone is dressed nice and maids put a lot of preparation for the guests. In the Bride's cave, where in Act I seemed simplistic and plain, it is also festive. There are shades of white, grays, and cool blues. These colors begin to set the tone for the end of the play. In the final Act III, the atmosphere has completely darkened. It is described as murky. This foreshadows the death that awaits. Lorca uses these three main settings to keep the play unpredictable. Especially in the second Act when there are a lot of people and festives. The subtle color shades transition the setting to the last.
Act I had simpler scenes that took place in the homes of the mother, Leonardo, and the Bride. In Act II, there is a larger contrast from Act I. Act II, Scene I, starts off at the wedding party. Everyone is dressed nice and maids put a lot of preparation for the guests. In the Bride's cave, where in Act I seemed simplistic and plain, it is also festive. There are shades of white, grays, and cool blues. These colors begin to set the tone for the end of the play. In the final Act III, the atmosphere has completely darkened. It is described as murky. This foreshadows the death that awaits. Lorca uses these three main settings to keep the play unpredictable. Especially in the second Act when there are a lot of people and festives. The subtle color shades transition the setting to the last.
Friday, May 4, 2012
Journal #7 Blood Wedding
There are a variety of youth in the second act. Why? How does Lorca use the youth to affect the themes of the play?
In the second Act II, Lorca shows youth in a variety of ways and how it can waste away. The bride speaks of her own mother "[she] came from a place where there were many trees, from a fertile land..but she wasted away here" (39). This indicates that where they are now is a place that is like the old and barren, a place to die. This contrasts with the maid who treats the Bride like a child who reluctantly continues the wedding. The Bride is a complex character. She does now wish to marry and seems to see it as losing her freedom, yet, she instigates Leonardo and the Groom's slaying leaving her all alone. I think the orange flowers she refuses to wear represent youth and innocence. Like a flower, they have a blooming and golden period before they wither away. Than there is the chorus of girls (first, second, and third) who sing about the excitement before a marriage. They imagine a gallant lover and her long hair flowing like something out of a fairy tale. This again shows the innocent, beauty of youth. They use nature in their versus, especially flowers. Unlike the Bride, the Bridegroom enjoys this feeling of youth. "It makes me happy to see you wearing your crown!" (54).
In the second Act II, Lorca shows youth in a variety of ways and how it can waste away. The bride speaks of her own mother "[she] came from a place where there were many trees, from a fertile land..but she wasted away here" (39). This indicates that where they are now is a place that is like the old and barren, a place to die. This contrasts with the maid who treats the Bride like a child who reluctantly continues the wedding. The Bride is a complex character. She does now wish to marry and seems to see it as losing her freedom, yet, she instigates Leonardo and the Groom's slaying leaving her all alone. I think the orange flowers she refuses to wear represent youth and innocence. Like a flower, they have a blooming and golden period before they wither away. Than there is the chorus of girls (first, second, and third) who sing about the excitement before a marriage. They imagine a gallant lover and her long hair flowing like something out of a fairy tale. This again shows the innocent, beauty of youth. They use nature in their versus, especially flowers. Unlike the Bride, the Bridegroom enjoys this feeling of youth. "It makes me happy to see you wearing your crown!" (54).
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Journal #6 Blood Wedding
Which characters appear to be miserable int he play and why? When and how do the characters express their misery? What do the characters desire and what stops them from going after what each desires?
The mother is the most miserable character because she has already lost a husband and son, and soon will lose another. By the way she constantly expresses her hatred towards the Felix and the pain it caused her, it is evident she had not started the healing process what so ever. She is constantly suspicious of anyone with the name Felix and this causes herself more misery because she is not free, but weighted by these heavy emotions. "I ache down to the end of my veins! On all their faces, I see nothing but the hand that killed what was mine. Do you seem? Don't I seem mad to you? Well, I am mad-from not having shouted out everything I needed to. I have a scream in my throat" (60). From this quote, the mother describes how repressed she is from expressing her emotions. The people around her tell her to "leave it alone!" (60) or "Control yourself! What do you gain from this?" (16). Thus, because of society the mother dwells in her misery, only able to express it when she has the rare chance, only to get shut up.
The mother is the most miserable character because she has already lost a husband and son, and soon will lose another. By the way she constantly expresses her hatred towards the Felix and the pain it caused her, it is evident she had not started the healing process what so ever. She is constantly suspicious of anyone with the name Felix and this causes herself more misery because she is not free, but weighted by these heavy emotions. "I ache down to the end of my veins! On all their faces, I see nothing but the hand that killed what was mine. Do you seem? Don't I seem mad to you? Well, I am mad-from not having shouted out everything I needed to. I have a scream in my throat" (60). From this quote, the mother describes how repressed she is from expressing her emotions. The people around her tell her to "leave it alone!" (60) or "Control yourself! What do you gain from this?" (16). Thus, because of society the mother dwells in her misery, only able to express it when she has the rare chance, only to get shut up.
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Journal #5 Blood Wedding
Journal #5 Examine how Lorca characterize the archetypes of the play. Does Lorca embrace or reject the archetype? What is the effect of the characterization?
I noticed how female characters and male characters contrast. At the start of Act II, the mother in law is singing a lullaby to the child. This shows the universal role as a homemaker. In her song or poem, she foreshadows the future. This also shows she is wise. Leonardo, however, is portrayed as a man who doesn't give too much time to his family. He lies to his wife about traveling to the wasteland. But in the case of the Brides and the Bridegroom, the gender traits are flipped. The bride is rude and unfaithful. The bridegroom although a lot more caring than Leonardo, still is portrayed harsher than the other females (besides the bride). Lorca rejects the norm that females are patient, faithful, and kind in the Bride's character.
Another symbol is money. Leonard's mother, the mother in law, states "Two wealthy families are going to be joined" (24). This shows how wealthy people are talked about and have a higher status. The girl is very interested in what they can buy. "The bridegroom came to the store, and he's bought the best of everything!" (24). Again, this shows the status people hold if they have money. However, the bride rejects the presents even though "women dream of such stockings!" (24). Her rejection is due to the fact that she does not look forward to the wedding because she is in love with another man. Lorca's characterizes the Bride to not fit the female stereotype nor value money. I think he embraces both because the Bride is expected to marry off and therefore attempts to do that. Her disdain for the gifts shows her love for Leonardo. Although a dislikable character, Lorca uses her to address social symbols.
I noticed how female characters and male characters contrast. At the start of Act II, the mother in law is singing a lullaby to the child. This shows the universal role as a homemaker. In her song or poem, she foreshadows the future. This also shows she is wise. Leonardo, however, is portrayed as a man who doesn't give too much time to his family. He lies to his wife about traveling to the wasteland. But in the case of the Brides and the Bridegroom, the gender traits are flipped. The bride is rude and unfaithful. The bridegroom although a lot more caring than Leonardo, still is portrayed harsher than the other females (besides the bride). Lorca rejects the norm that females are patient, faithful, and kind in the Bride's character.
Another symbol is money. Leonard's mother, the mother in law, states "Two wealthy families are going to be joined" (24). This shows how wealthy people are talked about and have a higher status. The girl is very interested in what they can buy. "The bridegroom came to the store, and he's bought the best of everything!" (24). Again, this shows the status people hold if they have money. However, the bride rejects the presents even though "women dream of such stockings!" (24). Her rejection is due to the fact that she does not look forward to the wedding because she is in love with another man. Lorca's characterizes the Bride to not fit the female stereotype nor value money. I think he embraces both because the Bride is expected to marry off and therefore attempts to do that. Her disdain for the gifts shows her love for Leonardo. Although a dislikable character, Lorca uses her to address social symbols.
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
Journal #4 Blood Wedding
Two symbols that emerged in Act I are flowers and walls. The mother brings up both of them. She describes the knives as evil and the creation of monsters that destroyed her husband and son who were like flowers. She uses different flowers to describe them: carnations, germanium, and several others throughout the play. The mother treats the wall as her commitment. "I didn't look at anyone. I looked at your father, and when they killed him, I looked at the wall in front of me. One woman with one man, and that's it" (10). And again, she mentions the wall with her commitment to her husband and honoring his death. "Because I will dig him up with my fingernails! And all by myself, I will smash him against the wall!" (9). There is a metaphorical and physical wall. One that blocks the mother from the outside world and one she uses to destroy. The mother varies in tone, from beautiful flowers to smashing against walls. It shows her distress from the lives lost. Lorca uses a lot of nature in the play. Flowers are one of the natural beauties in the world. Describing people as flowers shows genuine beauty and kindness. The wall is man made. Marriage is man made. Jealousy, anger, killing, love are all derived from men. When the mother talks about her commitment as a wall, she makes it sound like something she was enslaved to, not necessarily out of love.
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Journal #3 The Wild Duck
Isben carefully lays the plot in a way where the reader has trouble naming the blame on one character. I have listed the characters I believe are guilty and list the reasons why.
Greggers: Instigating the whole plot. His hatred of his father leads him to want to anger him by telling Hjalmar the truth. He also convinced Hedvig to kill the wild duck as a symbol of her love and sacrifice. Greggers romanticizes how truth makes way for happiness, without looking at the consequences. He expected Hjalmar and Gina to resolve quickly.
Relling: He creates deception in Hjalmar's life. He thinks that the invention is a good lie though, to keep him motivated to live. This is debatable. He is guilty to adding more lies into his life.
Gina: She lied to Hjalmar from the very start and kept it a secret. I believe she is to be blamed the most. She also does not seem very apologetic when he finds out the truth. Rather, she calls Greggers a monster that has walked through their lives. If she had been truthful from the start, Hjalmar could have decided whether to forgive her or not.
Werle: He cheated on his wife which created Greggers suspicious personality. He pursued Gina. He supported Hjalmar financially, but by doing this, takes away his dignity.
Hjalmar: He does not tell Hedvig the truth about her eyes. He treats her as Gina has treated him. He also tries to make himself feel better by feeling guilty. Instead of facing the truth, he lies to himself. Saying how hard he works, and how hard it is to be a breadwinner.
All the characters can be argued that their action was justifiable because they thought it was the best thing to do. Isben does not directly show what he believed in. We don't know how Hjalmar ends up. He could end up an alcoholic according to Relling, or learn from Hedvig according to Greggers. Who knows? I do know that Isben believed that honesty was the best way to enter a situation, even if it is ugly. Mrs. Sorby and Werle are honest about everything and are able to forgive each other. It is hard to say what should have been done in Hjalmar's situation, but if Gina had been honest from the start, everything could have been prevented.
Mrs. Sorby, Hedvig, Ekdal, and Molvik are not to blame. Either they did not know the truth, were the victim of deception, or were not obliged to step into the situation.
Greggers: Instigating the whole plot. His hatred of his father leads him to want to anger him by telling Hjalmar the truth. He also convinced Hedvig to kill the wild duck as a symbol of her love and sacrifice. Greggers romanticizes how truth makes way for happiness, without looking at the consequences. He expected Hjalmar and Gina to resolve quickly.
Relling: He creates deception in Hjalmar's life. He thinks that the invention is a good lie though, to keep him motivated to live. This is debatable. He is guilty to adding more lies into his life.
Gina: She lied to Hjalmar from the very start and kept it a secret. I believe she is to be blamed the most. She also does not seem very apologetic when he finds out the truth. Rather, she calls Greggers a monster that has walked through their lives. If she had been truthful from the start, Hjalmar could have decided whether to forgive her or not.
Werle: He cheated on his wife which created Greggers suspicious personality. He pursued Gina. He supported Hjalmar financially, but by doing this, takes away his dignity.
Hjalmar: He does not tell Hedvig the truth about her eyes. He treats her as Gina has treated him. He also tries to make himself feel better by feeling guilty. Instead of facing the truth, he lies to himself. Saying how hard he works, and how hard it is to be a breadwinner.
All the characters can be argued that their action was justifiable because they thought it was the best thing to do. Isben does not directly show what he believed in. We don't know how Hjalmar ends up. He could end up an alcoholic according to Relling, or learn from Hedvig according to Greggers. Who knows? I do know that Isben believed that honesty was the best way to enter a situation, even if it is ugly. Mrs. Sorby and Werle are honest about everything and are able to forgive each other. It is hard to say what should have been done in Hjalmar's situation, but if Gina had been honest from the start, everything could have been prevented.
Mrs. Sorby, Hedvig, Ekdal, and Molvik are not to blame. Either they did not know the truth, were the victim of deception, or were not obliged to step into the situation.
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Wild Duck Journal #2
Journal #2: How does Ibsen use the motif of decay, disease, illness, etc and to what effect? Use at least three quotes in the defense of you claim.
Ibsen uses the motif of decay, disease, and illness to show secrecy and suspicion. He does this show how these thoughts began to infest the mind and body. Like a parasite or cancer, the owner can only cure it. It is with them for life until they do so. Gregers is described with this disease and acknowledges it himself.
"Gregers: 'And besides-if I'm ever to go on living, I'll have to find a cure for my sick conscience'
Werle: It's never be sound. Your conscience has been sickly from childhood. It's an inheritance from your mother Gregers-the only inheritance she left you" (176).
From the text, it is known that Greger's mother had been jealous of Gina and suspected Werle being with other women. These thoughts became a disease that eventually killed her, according to Gregers. Like most diseases, they are contagious. Since Gregers and his mother were very close, it can be understood they discussed many thoughts together. Even after her death, Greger's is embodies with the same life sickness that he is determined to cure.
Relling explains to Gina Greger's condition, "He's suffering from an acute case of moralistic fever [...] it's a national disease, but it only breaks out now and then" (178).
After Greger's reveals the truth to Hjalmar, he becomes infested with it. Greger recovers and expects Hjalmer to also. However, in his bitter conflict he asks, "Do you think a man can recover so easily from the bitter cup I've just emptied!" (185). Medicine is most often bitter and drunk in cups. As if by letting out his suspicions he drank the cup, and hopes to heal soon enough.
Ibsen uses the motif of decay, disease, and illness to show secrecy and suspicion. He does this show how these thoughts began to infest the mind and body. Like a parasite or cancer, the owner can only cure it. It is with them for life until they do so. Gregers is described with this disease and acknowledges it himself.
"Gregers: 'And besides-if I'm ever to go on living, I'll have to find a cure for my sick conscience'
Werle: It's never be sound. Your conscience has been sickly from childhood. It's an inheritance from your mother Gregers-the only inheritance she left you" (176).
From the text, it is known that Greger's mother had been jealous of Gina and suspected Werle being with other women. These thoughts became a disease that eventually killed her, according to Gregers. Like most diseases, they are contagious. Since Gregers and his mother were very close, it can be understood they discussed many thoughts together. Even after her death, Greger's is embodies with the same life sickness that he is determined to cure.
Relling explains to Gina Greger's condition, "He's suffering from an acute case of moralistic fever [...] it's a national disease, but it only breaks out now and then" (178).
After Greger's reveals the truth to Hjalmar, he becomes infested with it. Greger recovers and expects Hjalmer to also. However, in his bitter conflict he asks, "Do you think a man can recover so easily from the bitter cup I've just emptied!" (185). Medicine is most often bitter and drunk in cups. As if by letting out his suspicions he drank the cup, and hopes to heal soon enough.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Wild Duck Journal #1
- Option 2: Examine how characters perceive themselves or others. Who has false conceptions of him/herself? Who has misconceptions of others? Who recognizes the facades created by other characters? Does the character embrace the facade, ignore it, or confront it?
In the Wild Duck, characters perceive each other quite differently then they do themselves. At the start of Chapter 2, Hedvig and Gina are conversing. Hedvig brings up her Dad, Hjamler, numerous times, awing at how he is at a dinner party. "Isn't it something to think that Daddy's at a big dinner party at old Mr. Werle's?" (138). She is very excited when he returns as well. "At last you're home, Daddy!" (140). Hedvig's perception of Hjalmer is imaginative and full of illusions that even Hjalmer wants to believe. As his wife and daughter ask him about his dinner party, he weaves in lies about what really happened. "'So you served that up to them, eh?' Hjalmer. 'Smack between the eyes they got it'" (142). Hjalmer depends on his illusions for his life goal to make the Ekdals something to be proud of. Another interesting part of the text was the disagreement of whether or not Hjalmer's hair is curly or wavy. Although this does not seem to be important, it can be added to Hedvig's view of Hjalmer. Curly hair is natural and wild, amounting to a facade of innocence.
At times, Hjalmer does show signs of knowing that he is not as great as he appears to his daughter. He uses the method of self pity and ignorance though. "What incredible things a family breadwinner is asked to remember; and if he forgets even the tiniest detail" (144). And when Hedvig calls him 'dearest', he replies, "No, don't call me that. There I sat, helping myself at a rich man's table, gorging myself with all good things" (145). Hjalmer is obsessed with money, success, and his image. Having those things are what keeps him living. This is why when he learns Hedvig may not be his real daughter, he goes mad conceiving that Hedvig's admiration for him was all a disguise.
Hedvig's happiness and innocence is also a lie. Hjalmer shields her from the truth; her eyes will fail her in the future. "She suspects nothing. She's carefree, gay, and singing like a tiny bird" (148). It is ironic, Hjalmer reacts so viciously when the truth was revealed to him but he has no problem keeping Hedvig's reality to himself. He says 'he doesn't have the heart to tell her'. Gina definitely took this approach as well when the to got married.
Hedvig's happiness and innocence is also a lie. Hjalmer shields her from the truth; her eyes will fail her in the future. "She suspects nothing. She's carefree, gay, and singing like a tiny bird" (148). It is ironic, Hjalmer reacts so viciously when the truth was revealed to him but he has no problem keeping Hedvig's reality to himself. He says 'he doesn't have the heart to tell her'. Gina definitely took this approach as well when the to got married.
Monday, April 9, 2012
Brave New World #3 Journal
Shakespeare is weaved into John's dialogue. Where as before Lenina repeated hypnopaedia now Huxley is showing how John was conditioned by the only book he read. The conclusion of the book i realized is also influenced by his readings of Shakespeare. There is a lot of killing and suicide in Shakespeare when the truth becomes too unbearable. In the World State people would take soma to forget. Both extremes do not try and learn from their mistake they either take their life or just completely forget it. I think Shakespeare is very important because it first appears good and real in contrast with the World State, but at the end it is evident that Huxley is pointing out the dangers of any method conditioning.
The setting of the World State remains the same, but with John there is a juxtaposition of two ideals. The reservation and the World State. When he is crying over Linda's death it directly contrasts with the ways of the World State and becomes a problem. In the Controller's secret room it contains things that are common in our society. The conversation between the Controller and John is important especially in the setting. The room contains books and knowledge. In John's world this knowledge is free to attain but the Indian's are still very rural. In the technological World State it is banned to remain stability.
The language in the last third stays relatively the same. John's language contrasts with the rest of the World State because of the influence of Shakespeare. However, he realizes how Shakespeare has mocked him, "The singing words mocked him derisively. "How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world …" (Chp 15). John's language becomes more and more emotional as he desperately please the people around him to see his cause, that they are not free.The rest of the World State continue to use uniform and scientific dialogue such as "Ford helps those who help themselves." Huxley continues to use descriptions containing crimson, twilight, and pneumatic as a motif. Crimson and twilight create an red glow atmosphere that has connotations of blood and flesh. Pneumatic demonstrates the comfort the World State allows and how problems are lost in the comfy airy chairs.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Brave New World Journal #2
Motif: I have noticed the use of 'crimson' and 'twilight' come up a lot to describe the setting and characters.
"The liftman slammed the gates, touched a button and instantly dropped back into the droning twilight of the well, the twilight of his own habitual stupor" (chp 4) This character is compared to the darkness of the well, inferring that his soul is empty. And than here: "and there, in the crimson darkness, stewingly warm on their cushion of peritoneum and gorged with blood-surrogate and hormones, the foetuses grew and grew or, poisoned, languished into a stunted Epsilonhood" (chp 10). On the dictionary.com I found that crimson means dark red and sanguinary.
Sanguinary: full of or characterized by bloodshed; bloody:
ready or eager to shed blood; bloodthirsty.
It is interesting Huxley chooses to describe the room in which humans are created as a bloodshed room. It could mean that the passion, flesh, real substance of humans is being lost because the babies are scientifically maid. His diction has connotations of negativity. Such as poisoned and darkness.
Setting: John learns in the World State that his home is: "savage reservation is a place which, owing to unfavourable climatic or geological conditions, or poverty of natural resources, has not been worth the expense of civilizing" (chp 11).
When Bernard and Lenina had gotten there, it was described as "THE MESA was like a ship becalmed in a strait of lion-coloured dust. The channel wound between precipitous banks, and slanting from one wall to the other across the valley ran a streak of green-the river and its fields. On the prow of that stone ship in the centre of the strait, and seemingly a part of it, a shaped and geometrical outcrop of the naked rock, stood the pueblo of Malpais. Block above block, each story smaller than the one below, the tall houses rose like stepped and amputated pyramids into the blue sky. At their feet lay a straggle of low buildings, a criss-cross of walls; and on three sides the precipices fell sheer into the plain. A few columns of smoke mounted perpendicularly into the windless air and were lost."
In the second description, it seems like a peaceful valley still raw with nature. Nature is lacking in the World State. There is too much technology. While in contrast, the World State's description depicts it as an awful place to be.
Language: Many of the characters speak robotic-ally because of their conditioning. "A gramme is better than a damn," said Lenina mechanically from behind her hands. "I wish I had my soma!" (Chp 7). They use sophisticated, unorthodox language. It demonstrates how the people in the society think. Comparable is John the Savage, although he speaks poetically it is still a repetition of what he has read, Shakespeare.
"Then suddenly he found himself reflecting that he had only to take hold of the zipper at her neck and give one long, strong pull … He shut his eyes, he shook his head with the gesture of a dog shaking its ears as it emerges from the water. Detestable thought! He was ashamed of himself. Pure and vestal modesty " (chp 9).
In the quote above, we see how language has affected the way John thinks. His words are elegant and passionate, and that's how he wants his life to be.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Brave New World Journal #1
Motif: In the first third, I noticed several things. The word pneumatic describing Lenina and chairs, identifying the people as animals, the phrase 'Oh Ford!', and the repetition of the hypnoaedic jingles. The dictionary definition of pneumatic is 1. containing air spaces to reduce weight 2. well rounded, esp with a large bosom. We first see the word used to describe Lenina. "Oh, she's a splendid girl. Wonderfully pneumatic" (chp 3) and than " When they had arrived and were comfortably stretched out on the pneumatic sofas in Bernard's room" (Chp 4). Pertaining to air holes is a strange way to describe things. It suggest the society has lots of holes, things that are lost in exchange for comfort. The repetitious use of 'Oh Ford' demonstrates what is important in the society. Ford alludes to Henry Ford who emphasized consumerism and technology. By changing the religious 'Oh Lord' to 'Ford', I can conclude that this society has replaced religion with materials and technology.
Setting: The first chapter is in some sort of science building. "And in effect the sultry darkness into which the students now followed him was visible and crimson, like the darkness of closed eyes on a summer's afternoon" (Chp 1). This description gives connotations of blood, organic body, organ pictures in the mind. Ironically, this is where they have replaced natural reproduction with decanting. As the Director shows the students around I can tell this society is very organized. People are in their places and doing their job.
Language: The language is rather formal. The characters use scientific words such as pneumatic and decanting in place of comfy and born. It is also mentioned about all the dead languages such as German, Spanish, and French. This novel was purposely written in English to show how the English prospered after the 9 years war. A lot of what the characters say is very rhythmical because they are repeating the sleep teachings. This society talks in very similar ways. Simple, scientific, and robotic-like.
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Journal #5
#5 Personal Philosophy
You will demonstrate your understanding of the importance of one's world view by scrutinizing your thoughts on how the world works and indentifying guiding principles for your own philosophy.
A. Give it a name
B. Identify seven to ten guiding principles: These should be clear and thoughtful – no clichés
C. Explain from where each principle developed and why it is important
A. Verdadasca
B.
1. Exploration of consciousness through meditation, isolation, altering substances, deprivation
My mom has mediated every day for 2 hours for the past 2 years and I have seen a distinct change in her nature. From stress to a more peaceful state of mind. Personally I find that when I have quality time with myself to ponder or not think at all I feel really refreshed. People need to focus on their self well being more.
2. Connecting with nature
Nature is very calming and can help the individual's well being. It is important to not forget our roots and also to leave our busy lives. When I take go hiking, camping, backpacking I feel human again.
3. Emphasis on self-learning, reading
Teenagers should be able to take their own classes that will directly help their career along with interests. School should be emphasized at a young age to be for one's self not for teachers, parents, or grades. It's important that what we do is for ourselves.
4. Limits on technology for recreational use
Even I am guilty of all these new 'toys' coming out. It is so much easier to play a game or go on Facebook than to do some meditation or read a thought provoking book.
5. Exercising and healthy dieting
America eats too much bad food. My mom always emphasized healthy eating, and I appreciate it now. Exercising I don't do so much, I wish I did though. I think it's important because in the future what I want to do will be determined by my health.
6. Accepting the meaningless of life, being honest with ourselves. Being rational.
Even if people make their own purpose of meaning to life, which is fine, I think people need to realize what they are creating and not just blindly follow it. Not denying what death is being open to talk about biological aspects of life.
7. Confidence in oneself and being alone
Inspired by Mr. Hunter S. Thompson "We are all alone, born alone, die alone, and -- in spite of True Romance magazines -- we shall all someday look back on our lives and see that, in spite of our company, we were alone the whole way. I do not say lonely -- at least, not all the time -- but essentially, and finally, alone. This is what makes your self-respect so important, and I don't see how you can respect yourself if you must look in the hearts and minds of others for your happiness.”
Journal #4
#4 What conclusions does Mersault come to at the end of the novel. Does Camus want the reader to come to the same conclusions?
Meursault comes to the conclusion of having no hope and accepting his fate. Before he explained how the executed should be given a morsel of hope, just a little. But now he says "that blind rage had washed me clean, ride me of hope; for the first time, in that night alive with signs and stars, I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the world" (122). He is having an epiphany, for the first time he is letting go of his wall and opening himself to the world. He says its like his brother because it is neither against or for him, just is. He feels happy. I believe Camus wants us to open up to the world and accept it for what it is, no matter how cruel or indifferent it seems to be truly happy. Probably not the day before your execution though. As soon as possible.
Sunday, March 11, 2012
Journal #3
Camus splits the novel into two parts for the narrator's purpose. In part one, he is explaining the events leading up to his imprisonment that resulted in his new ideas about life. In the first half, although in past tense, there is less of a sense of story telling: "I even had the impression that the dead woman lying in front of them didn't mean anything to them. But I think now that was a false impression" (11). In part two, we learn a lot about Meaursalt's thoughts. Even though he is living in a prison now he still holds his content personality. "I was almost surprised that I had ever enjoyed anything other than those rare moments when the judge would mead me to the door at his office" (71). However, the longer in prison he is the more realizations he has of life. He begins to reflect on life and meaning because "life was coming to a standstill" (72). In part one the sunlight was a given, to the point where it was unbearable. In prison he strains "toward the light" (73). The split shows the actions of a free man and the thoughts of a restrained man.
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Journal #2
Albert Camus uses first person point of view because it is a lot more personal. The reader knows all of Meursault's thoughts, which seem at first insignificant, but as we read on we realize how important they were. If this book was written from a third person point of view there would only be his action's to judge. Also, the reader has to trust the narrator. As first person, the reader can understand it is Meursault's story and he wants to tell every part because at the end of his life he realizes the significance to everything he has done or not done. Before, "To stay or to go, it amounted to the same thing" (57). He found soon after that he was quite wrong.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)